|
This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page, other than for maintenance. |
Mount_Yamantau (history - links - logs)[]
Per the reasoning for Cuba, Laos and a few others. Mt. Yamantau is not notable, as it is just a setting for the far more notable S&D mission that took place there. Sgt. S.S. 19:08, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
Support[]
Support — as nominator. Sgt. S.S. 19:08, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
Support — Per nomination 
Rambo362 20:18, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
Support — Great, ANOTHER of these pages. Seijana 21:05, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
Neutral[]
Oppose[]
Oppose — Mount Yamantau is highly notable in the Call of Duty series, it is the setting for a large Russian testing facility, which can't be covered by Wikipedia as it's purpose is fictitious. Smuff[citation provided] 18:19, February 28, 2011 (UTC)
Oppose — Setting for a mission, per above. --Callofduty4 18:30, February 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Like I said, the setting is not as notable as the mission itself. What little information we have about Mt. Yamantau can be covered in WMD. If all we can say is "this mission happened here", the article has no use. Sgt. S.S. 19:18, February 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Scratch that, what little information we have about Mt. Yamantau is covered in WMD. Sgt. S.S. 19:21, February 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Then we can remove it from WMD. --Callofduty4 20:41, February 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Now what would be the point of removing content from one article just to put it in another, except if the information is irrelevant/unneeded? Your logic is, no offence, ludicrous on that point. The whole article is just a brief summary of WMD, anyway. Sgt. S.S. 21:39, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Why is the information irrelevant or unneeded? Yet again, you've not been bothered to even hint at your reasoning. If you don't have any reasoning, why should I agree with you? --Callofduty4 18:00, March 3, 2011 (UTC)
- I do have reasoning. I said "Same reasons for Cuba and Laos", which were deleted per this. Sgt. S.S. 20:53, March 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, sorry, I didn't see that Mount Yamantau was a country. (What are you talking about)? --Callofduty4 02:18, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
- I do have reasoning. I said "Same reasons for Cuba and Laos", which were deleted per this. Sgt. S.S. 20:53, March 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Why is the information irrelevant or unneeded? Yet again, you've not been bothered to even hint at your reasoning. If you don't have any reasoning, why should I agree with you? --Callofduty4 18:00, March 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Now what would be the point of removing content from one article just to put it in another, except if the information is irrelevant/unneeded? Your logic is, no offence, ludicrous on that point. The whole article is just a brief summary of WMD, anyway. Sgt. S.S. 21:39, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Add a few pictures and you're good. Smuff[citation provided] 17:31, March 3, 2011 (UTC)
Images do not maketh the article, my friend. A couple of pictures doesn't change the fact that this article is unneeded. Sgt. S.S. 17:54, March 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Although they may not make an article, the do give an excellent idea of what the scenery looks like. The article also does mention the odd wee bit that WMD doesn't, such as how Mt. Yamantau doubled as a doomsday bunker. Smuff[citation provided] 18:01, March 3, 2011 (UTC)
- We could mention that in WMD (in fact, I believe the quote says just that). Sgt. S.S. 20:50, March 3, 2011 (UTC)
Oppose — Per Smuff 
NCD Эй, что рифмы! 08:20, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
Comments[]
Closed - No consensus. --Callofduty4 17:04, March 6, 2011 (UTC)