Call of Duty Wiki:Requested Improvement Drive Articles/Archive 3

This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page, other than for maintenance.

Removal of Hill 400 (2)

Adding onto criticism and advice from the last nomination, I've elaborated more on the plot of the mission, and added a gallery. With that, this article should be good to go.

Support

Support — As nominator.   ParagonX7 _跟我谈天 http://i.imgur.com/3hrm0HS.png 16:03, April 27, 2012 (UTC)

Support — Fresher articles that are worse off must be the main focus. Let's get this one out. YELLOWLUCARIO ^TALK  17:03, April 28, 2012 (UTC)

Support — Yeah, this article's good. Poketape ^Talk 19:49, April 28, 2012 (UTC)

Support — The Wikia Contributor ^{T | C | E | Q} 22:37, May 1, 2012 (UTC)

Support — Looks much better than last time. Argorrath _{おしゃべり} 01:23, May 4, 2012 (UTC)

Support — Redskin-26 22:40, May 4, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

Neutral — Not quite sure yet. http://i.imgur.com/vm7BQ.png 17:08, April 28, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Nomination Passes, Article will be removed. Poketape ^Talk 20:46, May 16, 2012 (UTC)

Sentry Grenade Launcher

Not that it's short, but it could use some rewriting and grammar fixes.

Support

Support — As nominator. Wuster1000 ^{NOT BACK} 22:02, May 3, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

Neutral — Sure isn't the best article around. I'm still not sure if it should go on ID though. Redskin-26 21:39, May 15, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral — Per the dude above me. -- laagone ^(talk)  19:47, May 18, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral — per teh peeps aboove. http://i.imgur.com/vm7BQ.png 19:52, May 18, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Nomination Successful, Article will be added. Poketape ^Talk 02:26, May 27, 2012 (UTC)

Removal of Sicily 1

After getting to elaborate on this article and giving it some meat, and making on par with most of the Campaign levels, I've added a "Plot" "Characters" "Weapon Loadout" and a "Gallery". With that I think that this article is good to go.

Support

Support — As Nominator Argorrath _{おしゃべり}02:11, May 4, 2012 (UTC)

Support — Looks good to me. Zombie Dropper^Talk 23:41, May 5, 2012 (UTC)

Support — Article has improved drastically, still not the greatest article out there, but good enough to be taken off ID. Redskin-26 21:11, May 9, 2012 (UTC)

Support — Per Nom The Wikia Contributor ^{T | C | E | Q} 23:22, May 14, 2012 (UTC)

Support — It would be laughable not removing the removal sign. BundeswehrGermany ^{RAMIREZ, fight the Russians off from Germany!} 19:45, May 18, 2012 (UTC)

Support — Ja. -- laagone ^(talk)  19:48, May 18, 2012 (UTC)

Support — per all. http://i.imgur.com/vm7BQ.png 19:52, May 18, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Nomination Successful, Article will be removed. Poketape ^Talk 02:26, May 27, 2012 (UTC)

Removal of Trenches (United Offensive)

Although Trenches isn't the best article I did manage to "spruce" it up, and give it a chance to fairly hold on its own, I'm trying to make a transcript for the mission right now.

Support

Support — As nominator Argorrath _{おしゃべり}05:59, May 19, 2012 (UTC)

Support — The page could use some images but other then that it looks good. Redskin-26 18:25, May 19, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Nomination Successful, Article will be removed. Poketape ^Talk 02:26, May 27, 2012 (UTC)

Remove Road to Remagen

The article has been given a lot of progression, It has been given a Gallery, Plot (or mission summary), Weapon Loadout, and a Characters list. It has improved greatly and is on par with many other campaign articles so I say it is good enough to be taken off ID.Argorrath _{おしゃべり}04:19, June 9, 2012 (UTC)

Support

1. Support — As Nominator. Argorrath _{おしゃべり}04:19, June 9, 2012 (UTC)
2. Support — Per Nom. Redskin-26 01:40, June 11, 2012 (UTC)
3. Support — Per Nominator. Madnessfan34537 http://i.imgur.com/lL5xjBH.png 18:22, June 12, 2012 (UTC)
4. Support — Article was greatly improved. Poketape ^Talk 18:19, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
5. Support — Per nom The Wikia Contributor ^{T | C | E | Q} 19:22, June 21, 2012 (UTC)
6. Support — Per nomination. The page looks great. DarkMetroid567^okay 01:16, June 26, 2012 (UTC)
7. Support — Article has greatly improved. Per all. Pierogi^Talk 15:36, June 28, 2012 (UTC)
8. Support — Per Nom. http://i.imgur.com/VwuEI.pngSXe Fiend · talkhttp://i.imgur.com/VwuEI.png15:49, June 29, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Nomination Passes, Article will be Removed. Poketape ^Talk 18:46, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

Removal of GRU

All though GRU isn't the best article out there, it seems hard to edit the article due to the article seemingly out of info. The faction is briefly mentioned and other than nthat seems that we have used all the info we can giv out unless it is intertwined with a further CD game, and I think its time to get it out of the ID.Argorrath _{おしゃべり}07:05, June 20, 2012 (UTC)

Support

1. Support — As Nom Argorrath _{おしゃべり}07:05, June 20, 2012 (UTC)
2. Support — Per nomination. DarkMetroid567^okay 01:16, June 26, 2012 (UTC)
3. Support — As good as it can be now. --MLGisNot4Me ^talk 16:14, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Oppose — Since it's not done it shouldn't be removed. The Wikia Contributor ^{T | C | E | Q} 19:22, June 21, 2012 (UTC)
2. Oppose — It seems to miss out the info it needs. --MLGisNot4Me ^talk 19:39, June 21, 2012 (UTC) Changing vote. --MLGisNot4Me ^talk 16:14, July 1, 2012 (UTC)
3. Oppose — Per TWC and MLG. Redskin-26 21:47, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
4. Oppose — Per TWC and MLG --Bats a.k.a Rarity Filly  23:34, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
5. Oppose — Per TWC and MLG Pierogi^Talk 00:51, June 26, 2012 (UTC)
6. Oppose — Per TWC and MLG Madnessfan34537 http://i.imgur.com/lL5xjBH.png 08:28, June 29, 2012 (UTC)
7. Oppose — Per TWC and MLG http://i.imgur.com/E2uiO5T.png Smilular^Talk http://i.imgur.com/KNXWYe1.png 20:43, June 29, 2012 (UTC)

   Inb4 C-C-C-COMBO BREAKER --MLGisNot4Me ^talk 20:46, June 29, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Comment — What is there to put in there, from what I see, nothing else of GRU is even mentioned, all we have is the intel to be fair they weren't explained almost at all, It just seems hard to upgrade a article that doesn't have much of an impact in Black Ops, only being mentioned as a faction of BO. Argorrath _{おしゃべり}01:11, June 26, 2012 (UTC)

For example, put the message the article talks about in the article. --MLGisNot4Me ^talk 16:23, June 28, 2012 (UTC)

Nomination Fails, Article will not be removed. Poketape ^Talk 18:48, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

I would say the voting is still a little bit in progress. Argo just added some sufficient stuff today, and most of the opposers haven't checked at it yet. --MLGisNot4Me ^talk 18:52, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

It's easier to just nominate it again, waiting for the opposing votes to notice would take longer. Poketape ^Talk 22:26, July 6, 2012 (UTC)

Agreed this nomination failed, and will take awhile for the opposition to see the change. Other nomination will have to occur again to be taken of ID.Argorrath _{おしゃべり}22:37, July 6, 2012 (UTC)

Lookout

this page really need to fix or need improved because i was just looking on this page and still nothing was improvement.No gameplay picture and lack of information. XSCX surprise!!!!

Support

1. Support — As Nominator XSCX surprise!!!!

Neutral

Neutral — Although not the best, it doesn't need much besides acouple lines of info, but doesn't need a full motioned drive for it. Argorrath _{おしゃべり}18:19, August 3, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral — Per Argo. Redskin-26 03:27, August 10, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Weak Oppose — It barely needs help, a few images could do it, but that doesn't mean in needs a full improvement drive. Bats a.k.a Rarity Filly  18:13, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
2. Oppose — Lookout is a decent, healthy article. We shouldn't put decent articles in the ID. DarkMetroid567^okay 03:24, August 4, 2012 (UTC)
3. Oppose — Per Metroid. Conqueror of all Zombies (talk) 02:19, August 5, 2012 (UTC)
4. Oppose — Per DM and Batman. Madnessfan34537 http://i.imgur.com/lL5xjBH.png 01:49, August 18, 2012 (UTC)

Nomination Fails, Article will not be added. Poketape ^Talk 03:55, August 23, 2012 (UTC)

Removing Sentry Grenade Launcher

Added some photos to the gallery. I think that's all we can do for this article.

Support

1. As nom.   ParagonX7 _跟我谈天 http://i.imgur.com/3hrm0HS.png 16:09, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
2. Per nom. --MLGisNot4Me ^talk 16:12, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
3. Its the best we can for it. Argorrath _{おしゃべり}16:15, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
4. We have worked enough on it. Bats a.k.a Rarity Filly  18:09, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
5. It is a strong article and doesn't have much more info to it due to it's limited appearance. DarkMetroid567^okay 20:16, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
6. I didn't even see anything wrong with it in the first place. 18:51, August 5, 2012 (UTC)
7. Per all. Madnessfan34537 http://i.imgur.com/lL5xjBH.png 02:01, August 18, 2012 (UTC)
8. Per nom. Redskin-26 14:27, August 19, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Nomination successful, Article will be removed. Poketape ^Talk 03:56, August 23, 2012 (UTC)

Removing Paris

Now has a large amount of information and pictures. I don't see anything more to improve.

Support

1. As nominator. --MLGisNot4Me ^talk 16:34, August 4, 2012 (UTC)
2. Best we can do.Argorrath _{おしゃべり}16:54, August 4, 2012 (UTC)
3. A good article that's reached it's full potential. DarkMetroid567^okay 20:19, August 4, 2012 (UTC)
4. Per all. --Bats a.k.a Rarity Filly  00:38, August 5, 2012 (UTC)
5. I don't see why not. -- mr_expert talk 16:34, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
6. Per all. Madnessfan34537 http://i.imgur.com/lL5xjBH.png 02:01, August 18, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Nomination Successful, Article will be removed. Poketape ^Talk 03:57, August 23, 2012 (UTC)

Removing Theater Mode

The article has all the current info regarding Theater Mode and I don't see how it could be expanded.

Support

1. As nominator. Conqueror of all Zombies (talk) 02:40, August 5, 2012 (UTC)
2. Although not the best, we gave it much info, and can't see how much more we can give it. Argorrath _{おしゃべり}10:15, August 5, 2012 (UTC)
3. Per Argo, it looks like that's all we can do. Madnessfan34537 http://i.imgur.com/lL5xjBH.png 02:02, August 18, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

1. While it seems to be doing well, it has almost no information on the theater mode in Modern Warfare 3 and is lacking in some parts. DarkMetroid567^okay 04:35, August 5, 2012 (UTC)
2. Per DM. --Bats a.k.a Rarity Filly  06:09, August 5, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Nomination Successful, Article will be removed. Argorrath _{おしゃべり}03:33, September 3, 2012 (UTC)

Removing Damage Multiplier

The article already has a good amount of info. Does it need anything else?

Support

1. As nom. 18:59, August 5, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

It's missing some info on Call of Duty 2, Call of Duty 3 and the games in between. DarkMetroid567^okay 04:08, August 6, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

1. It looks like it still needs a lot of work. Madnessfan34537 http://i.imgur.com/lL5xjBH.png 02:01, August 18, 2012 (UTC)

Nomination Fails, Article will not be removed Argorrath _{おしゃべり}03:38, September 3, 2012 (UTC)

PM63/Attachments

It really needs to be completed. One picture makes it a stub and in need of ID tbh.

Support

1. As nominator. YELLOWLUCARIO ^TALK  16:13, August 20, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

1. As stated by DM and I, many of the "X/Attachments" pages are in such condition, and in personal eye, is redundant as if that page is page, many of the same pages should be on ID then. Argorrath _{おしゃべり}00:50, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
2. Stub ≠ ID. Pierogi^Talk 01:23, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
3. Per Argorrath's votes and our comments below. DarkMetroid567^Talk 02:16, August 24, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Comment - Many of the attachment pages are in need of pictures such as the Uzi/Attachments and MAC11/Attachments...etc Argorrath _{おしゃべり}20:11, August 20, 2012 (UTC)

Per Argorrath. There are many, many pages exactly like this one. It seems to be too much of a waste to put all these pages into the ID (and I'm not exactly sure why these pages exist in the first place). DarkMetroid567^Talk 21:43, August 22, 2012 (UTC)

Closed- Article will not be added. Pierogi^Talk 00:26, September 7, 2012 (UTC)

Remove Ridley

Although it doesn't seem like the best article, the character only appears playable and only is shown in 1 mission. Although it may not look the best, it is the best we can do with so limited information.

Support

1. As Nom Argorrath _{おしゃべり}21:00, August 22, 2012 (UTC)
2. I supplied a lot of information for that article (I've supplied a good bit for the whole game actually), an if I come across anything else I'll add it, but the character is extremely flat, as the nom said, only appears in one level. Most of the player characters are never developed or fleshed out in MW3 for the DS, and Ridley is actually the best looking one of them all at the moment. 21:33, August 22, 2012 (UTC)
3. The page seems to be doing quite well, and kudos to Nitz X for supplying the information we could get. Per all. DarkMetroid567^Talk 21:35, August 22, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Nomination Successful, Article will be removed Argorrath _{おしゃべり}22:59, September 10, 2012 (UTC)

Adding Battle of Stalingrad

The article consists only of IRL information and requires extensive writing of the events that have occurred in and around Stalingrad, preferably on a larger scale and more in-depth than on the Stalingrad page; with additional images needed as well. As an alternative, anybody have any thoughts about merging the two articles?

Support

1. As nominator.
   

   Vera ^{Talk to me.}

   
   01:21, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
2. Per Nom, the page also has a redlink, and about 2 lines of info. Argorrath _{おしゃべり}01:25, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
3. These are the type of pages that need help through the ID. Per nomination and Argo's vote. DarkMetroid567^Talk 02:17, August 24, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Nomination successful, Article will be added. Argorrath _{おしゃべり}01:11, September 15, 2012 (UTC)

Remove GRU (2)

As previously stated last time, although the article doesn't seem good enough to be taken out of the ID, but as I see, GRU has very limited information that is given and used in the article. It may not look good but its the best we can do for now until it either comes into another game of CoD, or BO:D intel sheds more light on them.

Support

1. As Nom. Argorrath _{おしゃべり}18:36, August 25, 2012 (UTC)
2. I didn't catch the last nomination, and I fully agree with Argorrath. I don't see much more catching up on information that isn't there. DarkMetroid567^Talk 02:27, August 26, 2012 (UTC)
3. I honestly can't think of anything else that can be added to that article. Per nominator and DM.
   

   Vera ^{Talk to me.}

   
   16:32, August 29, 2012 (UTC)
4. Per nominator. --MLGisNot4Me ^talk 07:24, September 12, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Nomination Passes, article will be taken out of ID. Argorrath _{おしゃべり}17:12, September 15, 2012 (UTC)

Removal of Beachhead Studios

Although it doesn't seem well, compared to many of our other IRL article of companies and holds well. It gain much more and the information is well spread out. Personally, I think its time to remove it from ID.

Support

1. As Nom. Argorrath _{おしゃべり}02:30, October 2, 2012 (UTC)
2. I suppose that if more information comes about it can be added. This is a good article. YELLOWLUCARIO ^TALK  15:25, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
3. Why not. --MLGisNot4Me ^talk 15:26, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
4. Per Argo. Redskin-26 15:28, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
5. Per Nom and YellowRiolu. Joseph Tan ^{l talk l edit count l contribs l} 02:19, October 7, 2012 (UTC)

   Nice try. :P YELLOWLUCARIO ^TALK  16:37, October 7, 2012 (UTC)

6. Per Nom.
   

   Vera ^{Talk to me.}

   
   02:40, October 7, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Nomination Passes, article will be taken out of ID. Argorrath _{おしゃべり}03:45, October 16, 2012 (UTC)

Removing Eclipse Easter Egg/Transcript

It seems we have done enough work on the article for it not to be needed on the improvement drive anymore. We have the dialogue down completely. Not much more we can add. --Bats a.k.a Rarity Filly  12:42, October 18, 2012 (UTC)

Support

Support — Per Batman, improvements can still be made, but it seems worthy enough to be removed from ID. Reznov115^Talk

Support — Per Batman. And thank you to whoever finished it; I've wanted this article out of ID for a long time, but I couldn't do anything to it myself (except attempt to listen to the dialogue from YT videos over commentary which is what I used to start it when I created the page) because I'm forever alone when it comes to CoD online. --MLGisNot4Me ^talk 21:43, October 19, 2012 (UTC)

Support — Per Batman, this is the best we can do for the article. Argorrath _{おしゃべり}21:47, October 19, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Success-Article will be be taken off the ID. Argorrath _{おしゃべり}03:58, November 4, 2012 (UTC)

Collosus

This article needs a lot of improvement. The article has nearly no information that could be helpful, contains no information on what you do there, and does not contain any further information about the island. --Bats a.k.a Rarity Filly  15:19, November 26, 2012 (UTC)

Support

1. As nom. --Bats a.k.a Rarity Filly  15:19, November 26, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

1. I'm not sure, it seems more like a stub to me. Poketape ^Talk 01:19, December 11, 2012 (UTC)
2. Although some info could be appreciated, not much for a full pledge to the ID. More like a fairly longish stub. Argorrath _{おしゃべり}03:22, December 15, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Success - Article will be put on ID. Argorrath _{おしゃべり}06:06, December 23, 2012 (UTC)

Adding Rightful King

Doesn't have much content in it. Maybe someone who bought the book could summarize it.

Support

1. As nominator. Zombie Dropper^Talk 08:52, December 27, 2012 (UTC)

2. I agree, but sadly since I do not have this i can't be of help. Argorrath _{おしゃべり}02:35, December 28, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Success-Article will be put on ID. Argorrath _{おしゃべり}00:13, January 18, 2013 (UTC)

Adding Black Ops (series)

Passed over chat -http://i.imgur.com/GhKJh.pngP90^Deathmanhttp://i.imgur.com/uceaHlB.png02:58, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

Requests for Removal of Colossus and Black Ops (series)

• Colossus - Page seems to be very complete, has images and a good amount of content.
• Black Ops (series) - Information of Black Ops II has been added, which is why the article was in ID. The information does exactly match the Wikipedia article though, but I don't think that violates anything.

Support

1. As nom User:The Antibrony
2. Per nom. Argorrath _{おしゃべり}02:54, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Success - Articles will be taken off ID. Argorrath _{おしゃべり}04:59, March 6, 2013 (UTC)

Removing Damage Multiplier

While it isn't totally complete it is now a good article in my opinion, gives across the facts and needs very little work. I believe that it is of a better interest to the wiki's improvement drive if we remove Damage Multiplier indefinitely so to work on articles which are much more in need of receiving work/improvement. YELLOWLUCARIO ^TALK  18:25, May 27, 2013 (UTC)

Success - Article will be taken off ID. Argorrath _{おしゃべり}13:39, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

After Action Report

This page has been dead since MW3. The content on the page currently could be improved, as well as not having any info for the two most recent games. Images are also needed, as one of them falls under the potato quality rule.

Support

Support — As nom. http://i.imgur.com/4XBy83R.pngAntiScootaTwo^talk 

Support — I'll get to work on content for it ASAP. Images will be on other users however. http://fc01.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2013/276/1/2/bionicle__unity_duty_destiny_by_cyberpictures-d6p3li2.pngLegos-Rule-15 ^Talk 00:43, September 8, 2014 (UTC)

Support — i agree, it should have info for bo2 and codg by now. RisingSun2013 03:16, September 8, 2014 (UTC)

Support — Yeah, I think this needs to be WAY updated... it's like a ghost town RoachTheIntelCollector ^Talk 21:23, December 12, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Sucessful Nomination RisingSun2013 02:30, December 13, 2014 (UTC)

Removing Jonathan Shepherd

I've been improving the article quite a bit recently, and have added a biography, gallery section and made it generally more informative and larger. I also consider it a full article now instead of a stub.

Support

Support — As nominator.  Capt. Miller · talk 17:31, June 30, 2014 (UTC)

Support — Enough is fixed for it to be taken off. http://fc01.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2013/276/1/2/bionicle__unity_duty_destiny_by_cyberpictures-d6p3li2.pngLegos-Rule-15 ^Talk 17:35, June 30, 2014 (UTC)

Support — i agree, its no longer a stub and has plenty of information now. RisingSun2013 03:12, July 24, 2014 (UTC)

Support — The page looks finished and has good informationi. Higaboi21^talkhttp://i.imgur.com/KI7e8hQ.png 05:46, January 29, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Nomination Successful  RisingSun2024 ^{(Talk Page 🎌 Blog Posts 🎌 Contributions 🎌 Social Activity)} 22:49, February 22, 2015 (UTC)

Mined Games

No images. This article could definitely use some images to help illustrate the steps needed.

Support

Support —      01:27, July 5, 2013 (UTC)

Support — It 'should' have pictures. Rising Sun 2013 16:39, October 20, 2013 (UTC)

Support — More images would be helpful. http://fc01.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2013/276/1/2/bionicle__unity_duty_destiny_by_cyberpictures-d6p3li2.pngLegos-Rule-15 ^Talk 19:19, May 24, 2014 (UTC)

Neutral

1. The steps are greatly detailed, but much like High Maintenance it could use images to help visual the steps for people. Argorrath _{おしゃべり}04:08, July 17, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

The steps are greatly detailed. People would simply use a YT video with no sound if they want pictures. Hyperborrean22 (talk) 19:21, September 9, 2013 (UTC)Hyperborrean22

Comments

Comment — {{Needsimages}} -- laagone ^(talk)  02:02, July 5, 2013 (UTC)

I thought that too, but this really could use an overhaul with images.      02:19, July 5, 2013 (UTC)

Comment —  Not everyone can watch videos, so some pictures would be good. Rising Sun 2013 16:33, October 20, 2013 (UTC)

Comment — This has been open since July 2013, shouldn't we close it?  Capt. Miller · talk 11:11, June 12, 2014 (UTC)

i considered asking that yesterday. i think we should too. RisingSun2013 12:19, June 12, 2014 (UTC)

It should be closed now, and put into action. http://fc01.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2013/276/1/2/bionicle__unity_duty_destiny_by_cyberpictures-d6p3li2.pngLegos-Rule-15 ^Talk 16:02, June 18, 2014 (UTC)

i think an admin has to close it. RisingSun2013 21:22, June 18, 2014 (UTC)

Goddamn this is old.      01:46, March 28, 2015 (UTC)