FANDOM


Replacement filing cabinet This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page, other than for maintenance.


Recent Changes Patrollers and New User WelcomersEdit

A usergroup dedicated to patrolling recent changes in order to stop vandalism and trolling immediately. We would also welcome all new users. Although some users already perform these tasks, this would be organized in order to improve response times and provide better responses to vandalism. To be known as RCP and NUW. Darthkenobi0Personal Darthkenobi0 LightsaberBlogTalkContributions 22:33, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
Note: this group does not yet exist

Pictogram voting support Support 5
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral 0
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose 0


Support - As nominator. Darthkenobi0Personal Darthkenobi0 LightsaberBlogTalkContributions 22:33, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Most of the changes I've made have been providing response to vandalism and welcomes to new Users. 9G3sis0.pngRaven's wing Talk14:43, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Good thing to have even though i already do it. EvilGRAHAM 0Mmmm Free Goo!MG4 menu icon MW2 22:45, March 28, 2010 (UTC) User lacks mainspace edits. Tactical Nuke inventory icon MW2Poketape Talk 03:44, March 29, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral - It would be a good thing to have, but doesn't everyone already do that? Lt. Dunn (talk) 22:52, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - Yes Cpl. Dunn but this way we'll have a userbox and there could be discussion about vandalism (possibly the consequences, and the definitions?). Also, thanks for the support guys. Darthkenobi0Personal Darthkenobi0 LightsaberBlogTalkContributions 22:59, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

Support - I want to start helping the wiki more than I have been, and this group seems like the perfect place to start. Improving response times to both of these issues would be an extremely good thing Sactage 23:34, March 28, 2010 (UTC) User lacks mainspace edits. Tactical Nuke inventory icon MW2Poketape Talk 03:44, March 29, 2010 (UTC)

Support- I made a load of edits this January that undid some complete deletion of text in a document, resulting in banning of several vandals and IP addresses. I think a dedicated user group that sifted through all of the articles for vandalism would be costly for time, but would make this wiki much much better AC-130 inventory icon MW2 HeatedPete 15:54, March 29, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Instead of a user group, it could be in the Call of Duty Wiki editspace.  FANMADE_Animated_Derpy_Hooves_desktop_ponies_sprite.gif Sig1.png Sig2.png  17:18, March 29, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - update, to all who wish to view and/or join the group visit the group here. Darthkenobi0Talk|Blog|Contributions|Editcount 23:34, March 29, 2010 (UTC)

Change to Support - I have decided that it would be a great group to have. Lt. Dunn (Talk) 15:08, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

Nomination Complete, Usergroup is now Official Tactical Nuke inventory icon MW2Poketape Talk 18:39, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

Call of Duty Wiki ClanEdit

This is the wiki's official wiki clan. It is a group in which the users here can game together. It has relevance. The clan has rules and requirements ready and set out. It has twenty-plus members. It has been around for at least a month. All it needs is to become an official usergroup. Richtofen bio image WaW Doc. Richtofen 22:47, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support 7
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral 0
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose 0


Support - As nominator. Richtofen bio image WaW Doc. Richtofen 22:47, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Per nominator. Darthkenobi0Personal Darthkenobi0 LightsaberBlogTalkContributions 22:55, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

Support - We are a Clan from this wiki. Let's get more people to know about it! W567123daniel 14:50, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Per Doc. By the way Doc, if I'm not already in it, can I join? Lt. Dunn (talk) 22:50, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Where do I sign up?Dolten 22:54, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

sUPPORT- I'm in hooha --Personal Gen.Cain sigT C E B 17:22, March 29, 2010 (UTC)


Support This group is relevant. Tactical Nuke inventory icon MW2Poketape Talk 18:39, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

Nomination Complete Usergroup official. Tactical Nuke inventory icon MW2Poketape Talk 03:55, April 12, 2010 (UTC)

Alliance to stop Akimbo 1887sEdit

My usergroup was created in Late 2009, has 50 members and is a great group. Gloss Grenade emblem MW2DevilWarrior112Gloss Grenade emblem MW217:57, March 18, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support 1
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral 0
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose 3



Support - As nominator. Gloss Grenade emblem MW2DevilWarrior112Gloss Grenade emblem MW217:57, March 18, 2010 (UTC)


Question - Do you have a subpage for it, or is it based on a blog? -- EightOhEight 18:02, March 18, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - Subpage AND Blog. Gloss Grenade emblem MW2DevilWarrior112Gloss Grenade emblem MW218:11, March 18, 2010 (UTC)

Comment Please actually sign so we can check mainspace edits. Remember, it's just 4 tildes. Tactical Nuke inventory icon MW2Poketape Talk 03:32, March 22, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose I don't think there should be a group opposing weapons. They were put in the game to be used. Tactical Nuke inventory icon MW2Poketape Talk 03:32, March 22, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose This is just a fancy way of complaning. DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Let's Talk


Oppose - Per Poketape CoD_BEAST 23:07, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

Failed - No consensus made.  FANMADE_Animated_Derpy_Hooves_desktop_ponies_sprite.gif Sig1.png Sig2.png  22:01, April 16, 2010 (UTC)

B.olt A.ction R.ifle L.over'sEdit

This user group was actually proposed and created By Cpl. Dunn. There are two pages for this group:

http://callofduty.wikia.com/wiki/User:Cpl._Dunn/Bolt-Action_Rifle_Lovers and

http://callofduty.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Cpl._Dunn/New_usergroup

Pictogram voting support Support 5
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral 0
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose 0


Support - As nominator. --Personal Gen.Cain sigT C E B 17:28, March 29, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Per Gen.Cain? Cpt.Z 21:07, March 29, 2010 (UTC)

Strong support - no reason why not, it's really just a 'fan club' and it'll allow social discussions. Darthkenobi0Talk|Blog|Contributions|Editcount 23:27, March 29, 2010 (UTC)

Support - I just made it to be a "fan club", as Darthkenobi0 called it. Just like SPAS-12 lovers. Lt. Dunn (Talk) 12:45, March 30, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - Just to let everyone know, apply at the first link up there. I won't check the blog. Emblem-Anim-predator-missileLt. Dunn Talk 14:15, April 5, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Like the spas lovers but with bolt action rifles. Tactical Nuke inventory icon MW2Poketape Talk 04:01, April 12, 2010 (UTC)


Passed - Group is now an official Usergroup.  FANMADE_Animated_Derpy_Hooves_desktop_ponies_sprite.gif Sig1.png Sig2.png  21:58, April 16, 2010 (UTC)

The Gun PimpersEdit

We have recived guns from many people, and because Call of Duty is basically a "You get gun. You shoot German/Jap/Russian/Gangster/Italian." It makes perfect sense to put it on as a recreational group.

Pictogram voting support Support 5
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral 0
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose 0


Support- As nominator Sergeant InsigniaPeter Griffen BoyRadio Operator


Comment- Thanks for All of this support! (sarcasticly) Sergeant InsigniaPeter Griffen BoyRadio Operator

Support - I love the app, and since we've got SPAS-12 Lovers as a group, why not the Gun Pimpers? Darthkenobi0Talk|Blog|Contributions|Editcount 19:10, April 7, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Great group, support all the way. Mmm, Crispy... 18:42, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Good idea. Can I join? Personal Cpl.Dunn sig 23:51, April 13, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - Could this group be limited to only modify/make guns based on ones seen in the CoD series? Other wise it's just people showing of their creations, with no connection to CoD. This is the Call of Duty Wiki after all.TacKnifeNarrow Captain Hax 217 T C E 00:22, April 15, 2010 (UTC)

Support - As being the co-owner, I have no nood for a reason. Peeg, you could have added my vote already. Slowrider7 20:34, April 16, 2010 (UTC)

Comment to Above- I could of, then the self made Voting Patrol Oficcer, a.k.a. this guy would be all in my face. Sergeant InsigniaPeter Griffen BoyRadio Operator

Passed - Group is now an official Usergroup.  FANMADE_Animated_Derpy_Hooves_desktop_ponies_sprite.gif Sig1.png Sig2.png  21:58', April 16, 2010 (UTC)


Zombie SlayersEdit

I, Dolten have been working with Conqueror of all Zombies and Darthkenobi0, to create this. We will fix up the Nazi Zombie pages, make a task force for Zombiepedia, and have fun while were doing it!

Pictogram voting support Support 7
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral 0
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose 1


Support - As creator Doltensig 00:11, April 20, 2010 (UTC)

Support - as member. Personal Darthkenobi0 Air-force-logoDarthkenobi0Talk|Blog|Editcount 00:14, April 20, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - Nazi Zombie pages are fine and Usergroups should be related to the wiki. -- Burger Town Emblem MW2EightOhEight Talk 06:41, April 20, 2010 (UTC)

Support I agree. And I see a lot of problems with the Nazi Zombie pages. The quote pages need to be way reworked and the trivia on the pages is usually filled with spelling errors. --Tactical Nuke inventory icon MW2Poketape Talk 21:43, April 20, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - I have been working on the quote pages, I don't think they'll be too much of a problem soon. As for the zombie pages, they really need help, theres more "yous" in them than any other category on the wiki. Doltensig 23:26, April 20, 2010 (UTC)

Support - As member. AC-130 inventory icon MW2Commander W567123danielWanna Talk?|My Duty|Wassup? 01:56, April 21, 2010 (UTC)

Support- As creator. Nacht der Untoten Poster2Conqueror of all Zombies TalkNaziZombies 02:02, April 21, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Per Poketape. And EightOhEight, Nazi Zombies has relevance to Call of Duty. Richtofen bio image WaW Doc. Richtofen 16:56, April 21, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Nazi Zombies, as Richtofen said, is relevant to Call of Duty. Gloss Grenade emblem MW2DevilWarrior112Gloss Grenade emblem MW207:44, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - Has this vote been desided? Are the Zombie Slayers now a usergroup? Nacht der Untoten Poster2Conqueror of all Zombies TalkNaziZombies 23:09, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - Have patience, an admin will confirm this sooner or later.TacKnifeNarrow Captain Hax 217 T C E 23:24, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - Just wondering. Nacht der Untoten Poster2Conqueror of all Zombies TalkNaziZombies 23:28, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

Passed - Group is now an official Usergroup. Richtofen bio image WaW Doc. Richtofen 20:15, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - umm shouldn't this be archived? Personal Darthkenobi0 Air-force-logoDarthkenobi0Talk|Blog|Editcount 23:13, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - Will do now, I was waiting for an official page first. Richtofen bio image WaW Doc. Richtofen 16:20, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

Admins' Pets Edit

There are a large number of members so far, it simply needs a page, it would basically be either a recreational group with the intent of designating users dedicated to helping the wiki and aspiring to use sysop tools one day. It might also be a project group with the intent of aiding the admins of this wiki. Here is what there is so far: the blog discussion on it: User blog:Sactage/Admin's pet usergroup guidelines discussion,  and the non-official page:user:sactage/Admin's Pets

Pictogram voting support Support 3
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral 0
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose 1


Oppose - no definitive purpose. -- Burger Town Emblem MW2EightOhEight Talk 03:45, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Per Darth. Richtofen bio image WaW Doc. Richtofen 16:20, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

Strong support - It's pourpose would be to help the admins, like an intern would doGenCain sig T C E B 22:23, April 30, 2010 (UTC) - Please read the new guidelines before voting. -- Burger Town Emblem MW2EightOhEight Talk 17:11, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

Administrative internship doesn't sound like a good idea to me. US Army WWII MSGTSgt. ChiafriendRifleman 01:40, May 1, 2010 (UTC)
Comment - Disregard what CE said 'bout admin intership. That's not what it is. Tactical Nuke inventory icon MW2Sactage Talk 02:09, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - They 808, do you oppose every Usergroup? Nacht der Untoten Poster2Conqueror of all Zombies TalkNaziZombies 00:52, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - the ones with no definitive purpose. -- Burger Town Emblem MW2EightOhEight Talk 03:48, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

Strong support - Per Cain. Doltensig 11:27, May 1, 2010 (UTC) - Please read the new guidelines before voting. -- Burger Town Emblem MW2EightOhEight Talk 17:11, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - 808, where are the new guidelines posted? I can't find them ANYWHERE. Tactical Nuke inventory icon MW2Sactage Talk 21:49, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

"Voting Guidelines" -- Burger Town Emblem MW2EightOhEight Talk 00:33, May 2, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Good idea. Per nominator. LDunn Talk to me. Edits 22:12, May 1, 2010 (UTC) - I didn't know about the new guidelines. Sorry. LDunn Talk to me. Edits 22:21, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

Strong Support - I see no reason why not. He's just helping the admins, not getting any power. Sort of like a mini-mod. TheManOfIronT C E B 00:22, May 4, 2010 (UTC)

Support If they want to help out they might as well, but I think the members should be approved by admins as the group's name seems to show. Personal Poketape 8-bit Price Emblem flippedPoketape Talk8-bit Price Emblem MW2 03:43, May 12, 2010 (UTC)

Voting Closed - Usergroup is now official. Richtofen bio image WaW Doc. Richtofen 14:28, May 12, 2010 (UTC)

Admins' PetsEdit

There are a large number of members so far. It would be a recreational group. The page for this user group can be found here.

Pictogram voting support Support 2
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral 0
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose 4

Support - Would be a great way for users to learn how to be a good future administrator. Richtofen bio image WaW Doc. Richtofen 17:49, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

Support I coulda sworn we just passed this one --GenCain sig T C E B 18:05, May 15, 2010 (UTC) Member of the group can't vote. 404 Error File Not Found Please Try Again 18:06, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

Comment- I thought this one was passed a couple of days ago? AC-130 inventory icon MW2 HeatedPeteTalk 20:38, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - Reverted Richtofen bio image WaW Doc. Richtofen 20:44, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - Ahh. this may help (sorry bout external) AC-130 inventory icon MW2 HeatedPeteTalk 20:49, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

Support Might as well support again. Personal Poketape 8-bit Price Emblem flippedPoketape Talk8-bit Price Emblem MW2 00:32, May 16, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - I don't see either a project-helping cause for this group nor a recreational cause, other than sucking up to administrators. It's implied, by the name and what it 'does', that this is similar to a form of ROTC for adminship. It glorifies the administration and doesn't accomplish anything. US Army WWII MSGTSgt. ChiafriendRifleman 07:33, May 16, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - Per Chia. -- Treasure Map emblem MW2EightOhEight TalkPirate emblem MW2 07:38, May 16, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - I am not a fan of this, nor am I a fan of usergroups in general.  FANMADE_Animated_Derpy_Hooves_desktop_ponies_sprite.gif Sig1.png Sig2.png  11:26, May 16, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - I don't think that this should be an officially recognized usergroup, but generally speaking members of the group are very helpful, and it is somewhat, dare I say, endearing? It doesn't need to be official for it to serve its purpose. Imrlybord7 04:58, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - I'm a bit fuzzy about the duties of members who have been "adopted", and what the actual function of the group is. Warpig3|1|2 05:04, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

Request withdrawn - As leader of group. 404 Error File Not Found Please Try Again 11:41, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

Official Firearm ExpertsEdit

We would be a lot like the ATEFI, but we would only allow much more experinced users to join. It would be a mostly recreational group, although we would change any false "truths." Doltensig 01:06, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support 1
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral 0
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose 3

Oppose - It might make users that don't get accepted feel inferior. Also, we have the ATEFI, so this group is unneeded.Cpl. Dunn(Talk)

Oppose - We have the ATEFI, we don't need another firearms expert group. Gloss Grenade emblem MW2DevilWarrior112Gloss Grenade emblem MW2

Oppose per all Personal Poketape 8-bit Price Emblem flippedPoketape Talk8-bit Price Emblem MW2 02:37, July 6, 2010 (UTC)

Group doesn't have 10 members.Personal Poketape 8-bit Price Emblem flippedPoketape Talk8-bit Price Emblem MW2 02:38, July 6, 2010 (UTC)


Ask A VeteranEdit

I'm not exactly sure what AAV is, it's halfway between a project group and an actual project, but I'd like if it got official status, it has more than enough members, with plenty more on the way (we'll have somewhere over twenty after I finish reviewing new requests) including several administrators, who have helped get it off the ground. We've created many guides so far, and provided some answers (several more guides are on the way). I feel that Ask A Veteran would help improve the Call of Duty Wiki as an official project group. I am not however asking that the guides be given a label as "Official Call of Duty Wiki Guides", only our group. Thank you for considering! TimSim(talk) 10:51, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support 4
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral 0
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose 0


Support - Guides are extremely helpful to other players and a great way to help inexperienced players grasp better understanding of game mechanics. Semtex HUD icon MW2 Bovell Talk | Contrib. 13:47, June 23, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Per Bovell Lima Oscar Zulu Zulu Alpha Harrier Emblem MW2

Support - A great way to help users/IPs. azuris_ 16:20, June 26, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Per Bovell. Happy Boy |Talk21:28, July 1, 2010 (UTC)

Nomination Complete, Group will be added. Personal Poketape 8-bit Price Emblem flippedPoketape Talk8-bit Price Emblem MW2 04:02, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

AC-130 LoversEdit

The usergroup has more than enough members, and has been aroung for 2 weeks on the 14th of July. I just feel that it should be a official usergroup. M200rampantlionRampantlion513 01:59, July 11, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support 0
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral 0
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose 1


Oppose - For now I oppose. It does not appear to have any real organization,leaders, ect. All it is right now is a list of users with a non template userbox. Nothing else. I feel it needs more before becoming an official usergroup. If that can be done you have my vote. Foxtrot12 03:54, July 13, 2010 (UTC)

Comment-I don't know how to make it a real template.M200rampantlionRampantlion513 16:18, July 13, 2010 (UTC)

Comment- I won't blame you for that but still it needs more. A general mission statement about the groups goals and purposes, a place for users to request membership, and maybe the ability to share AC-130 related stories between members. It still needs more to become official. Foxtrot12 14:54, July 18, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - The usergroup needs to be more established. Check out the orders above, then you'll know what to do. Gloss Grenade emblem MW2DevilWarrior112Gloss Grenade emblem MW216:17, July 18, 2010 (UTC)

Nomination Failed Personal Poketape 8-bit Price Emblem flippedPoketape Talk8-bit Price Emblem MW2 19:10, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

User:Advancedwarfighter/Explosives_and_Launchers_SpecialistsEdit

This usergroup has enough members, and we have been around for a long time. Advancedwarfighter 10:26, July 17, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - It doesn't have a page, and could you show us some members of the group. I have never heard of it. Blinzy[45] 10:31, July 17, 2010 (UTC)

Sorry Blinzy, I forgot to add a link.... Advancedwarfighter 09:34, July 27, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose It needs to be more established. I haven't heard of it either. Personal Poketape 8-bit Price Emblem flippedPoketape Talk8-bit Price Emblem MW2 19:10, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Nomination Failed Personal Poketape 8-bit Price Emblem flippedPoketape Talk8-bit Price Emblem MW2 19:10, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

AC-130 LoversEdit

Well.I figure we should try again.Anyway we are running for Recreational usergroup. We have more than enough users,and have been around for a long, long, long, time. 04:48, August 21, 2010 (UTC)

Vote Closed - Nomination unsuccessfull. Doc.Richtofen (Talk) 14:44, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

The NeutralistsEdit

I have heard that the War Room is meant for usergroups to discuss the process. If so, please comment, and we will move it.

Umm... yeah! Hi guys! Well, I'm attempting to create a new usergroup that seeks to help admins by reporting any unruly, unacceptable or inappropriate behavior. The group is called 'The Neutralists', and you can search up User:Tsunami Volt/The Neutralists.

However, I must say that we have very few official members, although the usergroup has garnered quite a lot of attention. It's been up and running for about 2 or 3 weeks, and it's pretty complete.

Also, I forgot to mention, but the usergroup's page, as of this day, incorrectly states that we are attempting to help solve any flame wars or arguments. After a very recent proposal, we have decided to omit this part from our responsibilities, and will simply patrol and report behavior that we find is unacceptable to the community.

Lightning bolt 2Tsunami VoltTalkLightning bolt 07:59, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

VotingEdit

Please comment with your chosen vote, and feel free to also state why you support/oppose/remain neutral, or any suggestions you would like to make to help improve the usergroup (and the Wiki as a whole, if I'm not being sarcastic).

Pictogram voting oppose Weak Oppose — I see no point in this group. (Upon fully reading the proposal and realising the usergroup has given up their intentions of trying to deal with flaming, I'm changing this to a weak oppose) -- sactage (talk) 13:11, June 13, 2011 (UTC) -- Meh, looking at some other stuff, I might as well support, since the group's purpose actually makes sense. Does it meet the requirements, however? -- sactage (talk) 13:48, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Weak Support -- per my above text. -- sactage (talk) 13:48, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Does not meet all the requirements. — -- mr_expert talk 14:42, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

How? It has 5 members, has a valid reason and has been around for atleast a week. MercyDudebotTalkWelcome to Freedom 23:40, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
That's not a grounds for opposal, more of a grounds for dismissal, but it doesn't seem as if it shall pass, regardless. -- sactage (talk) 13:19, June 14, 2011 (UTC)
Also, @dudebot, it needs to have 10 members, as I don't believe it can be classified as a project group. -- sactage (talk) 13:20, June 14, 2011 (UTC)
Well, to counter that, let me say this - it may not be a project group, but the actions that we have agreed on taking will result in people getting warnings, banned, or blocked. That can't be a recreational group, right? Lightning bolt 2Tsunami VoltTalkLightning bolt 10:56, June 15, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — I would like to see the group actually do something, other than debating on members. PierogiTalk 00:02, June 14, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — I was talking to another user via IRC, and one of the members tried to stop us from talking and threatening to post a forum with what the other user said. Not the most mature group and also doesn't know when to not get involved. _Sp3cTalk_ 00:27, June 14, 2011 (UTC)

Basing your vote around one person's decision is not very fair. MercyDudebotTalkWelcome to Freedom 00:38, June 14, 2011 (UTC)
Well, it kind of is when that person is a master member =\. PierogiTalk 00:46, June 14, 2011 (UTC)

I would like to point out that this group has only been here for 13 days. PierogiTalk 00:34, June 14, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — I understand people's views, but I would like to object to some of the reasons given. For one, we do meet all the requirements (the misunderstanding could be based around the fact that the user believed that this was a Recreational Usergroup, and so believed that it required 10 people), we have been around for a week (today marks the second week in operation), and we do have a valid goal. If someone were to help me and see if there were other requirements. For Cpl.Bohater's case, I don't understand what he means by 'debating on members'. If this is pointing to the fact that we are actively pursuing and attempting to cease flame wars, we are NOT. In fact, Cpl.Bohater was the reason I pursued the proposal to switch to simply reporting users who are carrying out inappropriate behavior. If it meant something else, then any user (or Cpl.Bohater himself) is more than welcome to respond and correct me.

For Sp3c's case, the incident could possibly have happened before the current changes and proposal was carried out. Also, I don't believe one of our members was involved at all. I'm not sure if it is possible, but is there a way to view the history of IRC chats, and to provide the username of the user in question (although if it may be against Wiki policies or simply an act of disregarding universal privacy requirements, then ignore this request), could a user do so. I understand that we are quite a new group, and we will attempt to improve on any of our guidelines or actions.

By the way, the current page for the usergroup is not correct. I have the revised version, but I'm going to wait for the events of the vote (seeing that if it fails, I can immediately apply the changes, but if it succeeds, I can simply copy the revised version into the assigned page).

Thank you for your attention and time, and we respect all your opinions and suggestions on improving the usergroup. Lightning bolt 2Tsunami VoltTalkLightning bolt 08:06, June 14, 2011 (UTC)

I hardly see any reporting going on. PierogiTalk 21:26, June 14, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Personally, I don't really see this group reporting much vandilism. Besides, we have Anti-vandal groups already (e.g Image Guardians, Night Patrol etc.).Major Rank MarinesReznov115TalkExpertDeserteagle 19:32, June 25, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — I dont see much work being done by the users in this group. And Per Reznov115. And bribing people with Senior Membership doesnt seem right... Personal Drkdragonz66 Admincrown DrkDragonz66 Personal Drkdragonz66 Garintina  Talk  Contribs  Combat Arms   19:38, June 25, 2011 (UTC)

Voting Closed - Well, it's clear that the community is clearly opposed to the idea. But thank you for your comments and suggestions, and we will try to improve and begin to help the wiki more often. Lightning bolt 2Tsunami VoltTalkLightning bolt 13:12, June 27, 2011 (UTC)

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.