Totally useless page Edit

Well, that's great, I thought admins had talk pages. Maybe that changed all of a sudden. What is the point of this? Nothing.  Callofduty4 ^Octavia  23:07, September 1, 2011 (UTC)

It's not totally useless. Admins such as Poketape and CoaZ who rarely or never go on IRC have a higher chance to help people (which most people find something nice to do on both sides), and while there are talk pages, it's not a bad thing to have this. I must mention that your talk page gets sometimes so much traffic that you don't even notice that there are multiple messages, thinking the older new one(s) is already read, and thus you ignore it. True story. Oh, and why not get rid of CVU, because there are talk pages?? - MLGISNOT4ME ^[Talk] - 23:16, September 1, 2011 (UTC)

I agree with MLG about your talk page. I asked you to fix the AFD template on the Area 51 page, but you never replied, so this is not a totally useless page. Hip-techboy ^Christmas 23:30, September 1, 2011 (UTC)

Archiving? Edit

Since this is really similar to CVU, which doesn't use archiving, should this still use? Or at least keep the requests. While I don't see the requests as "discussions" of any sort, it just feels that they should be stored somewhere other than the page history. - MLGISNOT4ME ^[Talk] - 14:49, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

I'd rather just remove them from the page as they're answered. I really don't see much of a reason to archive them. Plus it would keep the page from getting really long. Carbonite 0 03:51, September 5, 2011 (UTC)

Archiving (again) Edit

Since the archiving system is often neglected (admittedly, I always forget it myself) and so the majority of requests were removed but not added there. Should the whole archive thing be removed altogether, as it isn't even very useful (it has little use, and they are still seen in page history)? --MLGisNot4Me ^talk 16:59, October 18, 2012 (UTC)