Call of Duty Wiki
Register
Advertisement
Call of Duty Wiki

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the CM901 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.

  • Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes at the end of your post (~~~~).
  • Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
  • New to Call of Duty Wiki? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.
Article policies
  • No opinionated research for articles
  • Have a neutral point of view
  • Verifiability

Source[]

Alright here's my proof. These guys rarely ever get it wrong. Knowing IW, they might name it something different but it's definitely a CM901 http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/Call_of_Duty:_Modern_Warfare_3#Colt_CM901 Sgt. Kamarov 15:53, August 10, 2011 (UTC)


KAC PDW[]

This gun could also be the KAC PDW check out my source. —Unsigned comment was added by Demonixelmo748

Kacpdwmw3dowd

The iron sights are very similar

Nope. The receiver is the wrong shape. Look at the page image. Raven's wing Talk22:33, August 11, 2011 (UTC)

Addendum: Along with the vent holes in the upper reciever being a different shape (the weapon in game has angled slots, the KAC PDW has round holes) and the whole thing being much longer. Raven's wing Talk22:34, August 11, 2011 (UTC)
Also, look at how the upper and lower receiver come together. Plus, the flip up iron sight on the KAC PDW is different than the one modeled on the CM901, which has a BIS (Back-up Iron Sight) that is used on every M4 I've seen in the Army (apart from the M4's with the carrying handle). Now, that doesn't help identify the CM901, but it also doesn't identify it as a PDW either, as since both iron sights are rail mounted they can be swapped out for others. Plus, judging on the size of the magazine it's probably "chambered" in 7.62x51. (the CM901 can me modified to use multiple calibers). This, and everything RW mentioned. Sgt. Kamarov 23:00, August 11, 2011 (UTC)

We need to put a link on the MW3 page that redirects to this weapon's page...99.135.107.70 00:29, August 13, 2011 (UTC)

Animation[]

Doesn't seem that long at all

Seems like the SCAR-H reload.

Archer250 00:35, August 13, 2011 (UTC)

I think we need to add a link to this page from the MW3 page, because its confirmed

^ First off, sign your post even if you're an anon. Second, make a topic about it then, don't post in "Animation" cuz it certainly doesn't belong here. Archer250 13:21, August 15, 2011 (UTC)

^i dont know how to make a new topic, and why are all you codwiki users so negative to anons?????99.135.107.70 21:12, August 16, 2011 (UTC)

We're not. Raven's wing Talk21:14, August 16, 2011 (UTC)

Archer was kinda a jerk...99.135.107.70 21:17, August 16, 2011 (UTC)

...How?Raven's wing Talk21:18, August 16, 2011 (UTC)

im just saying he should have said(typed) it in a more friendly way...99.135.107.70 21:22, August 16, 2011 (UTC)

Anon, I can assure you that Archer250 by no means meant to offend you. Also, here at this wiki we are not negative to all anons. We recognize that there are some very helpful and good anons who do a lot of great work here, which sometimes goes unnoticed. We are just wary because this is a big wiki. With that comes activity, and as a by-product vandals. Now, some vandals create an account first, but the majority use their anon cloak to vandalise. Despite this however, we never will prejudge anons before getting a good insight into who they are and what they are here for. I apoligise on behalf of Archer and hope that you decide to stay here and help create a better wiki. Best regards, TheDocRichtofen (Talk) 21:29, August 16, 2011 (UTC)

^ now THAT was friendly99.135.107.70 21:33, August 16, 2011 (UTC)

Apologies to you,sir. I find it hard to speak politely, I'll try my best next time. Archer250 09:34, August 17, 2011 (UTC)

its okHighbornBEN10 23:23, August 17, 2011 (UTC)

Move to MW3 page[]

Someone should post a link to this page on the MW3 page...99.135.107.70 21:38, August 16, 2011 (UTC)

The CM901 is an assult rifle? Because if we can't confirm which category the CM901 will be in MW3, it can't go on the page just yet. In real life it is an Assault Rifle come Battle Rifle, but the categories can sometimes change in the CoD universe. TheDocRichtofen (Talk) 21:44, August 16, 2011 (UTC)

Ya ik its a battle rifle...but i do see your point...maybe a new category for "type unkown"99.135.107.70 21:49, August 16, 2011 (UTC)

Yes that will do for now. You know how to create the appropriate sub-heading to add it in correctly into the article? TheDocRichtofen (Talk) 21:54, August 16, 2011 (UTC)

i have been using the wiki since MW2, but only for reading...so i dont know how to create pages/sections on pages99.135.107.70 21:56, August 16, 2011 (UTC)

i created an account and it wont let me add it cuz the page is lockedHighbornBEN10 22:21, August 16, 2011 (UTC)

thanx for adding that link!!! HighbornBEN10 23:24, August 17, 2011 (UTC)

Proof?[]

i said its reload is similar to the scar-h's (in time), why do you keep removing it? Seen in the specops trailer...HighbornBEN10 20:46, August 19, 2011 (UTC)

It's unessary. MofoMax 02:25, September 18, 2011 (UTC)

IAR[]

To anyone who feels like claiming this is the Colt IAR, I strongly advise you to do your research first. The CM901 is a modular assault rifle. It is completely different from the Light Support Weapon IAR, which is designed to be used in that role, and that role only.

As a final nail in the coffin to this idea, here's a photo of the Colt IAR. And here's a photo of the Colt CM901. Two completely different rifles.

Raven's wing Talk23:49, August 19, 2011 (UTC)

I note that the rifles appear different however if you have seen the early versions of the rifle back before the heat shield was added you would see that it was based and the 901 civi mod, aside for that the all that is different between the rifles is that the bottom rail is removed (a function that is on many RIS to allow the addition for things like the heat shield or an m203s to be added) the pistol grip, and the rifle stock. Furthermore, I don't think COD would promote upgrading civis to be full auto, it would look bad. —Unsigned comment was added by Anoncompany

Sorry, what? Raven's wing Talk07:41, August 20, 2011 (UTC)

Addendum: The CM901 has a completely different receiver shape to the IAR. The screenshots show the 901's angular receiver join. Raven's wing Talk07:43, August 20, 2011 (UTC)
Well... now i feel retarded I went back to talk with my men and they confirmed the the IAR will be a stand alone system instead of and upper reciver upgrade I belived it was. I retract all privious remarks and am sorry for any confusion or headach I put forth. The IAR will be the CM 6940 and the CM 901 will a completely different weapons system.

Similarities to other guns[]

It looks like an HK4I6, in some way. Because of the gun's body, and sights (front sight)

Still doesn't make it a 416. It's probably IS a CM901 since the joined reciever and handguard.

Archer250 06:14, August 27, 2011 (UTC)

And you forgot to mention the Colt logo on the charging handle... HighbornBEN10 00:45, September 1, 2011 (UTC)

Attachments[]

All attachments for this gun are in the akimbo trailer for MW3.

Semi-automatic?[]

Does anyone know if it is? It certainly looks like that kind of gun. Slowrider7 11:29, September 8, 2011 (UTC)

Nope, according to our friends over at IMFDB, it's actually the SP901, the semi-automatic version of the CM901, but IW have named it the CM (likely thinking both models look the same, no-one would know, or just be a mistake on their part) and in game footage released for MW3 from XP it's seen firing full auto. ChickenDoughnut 12:23, September 8, 2011 (UTC)

OK. I'm the guy who uploaded the SP901 image to IMFDB. I did this because I couldn't find an image of the CM901 to use. It is quite clearly stated that it is not an exact match, and that the in-game weapon is the full-auto CM901. Raven's wing Talk14:39, September 8, 2011 (UTC)

However, the image has since been replaced with the genuine article. Raven's wing Talk14:40, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
Alright, sorry, my mistake there. But to answer Slowrider, no, it's full auto :) ChickenDoughnut 22:56, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
:epicfuuuuuu: Slowrider7 20:01, September 9, 2011 (UTC)
Not many Colt AR-10s are semi auto :P, don't be surprised. .:Archer 250:. 00:40, September 10, 2011 (UTC)

Reload and Other stuff[]

Just watched the 45 minute gamespot video. The Cm9's reload is in NO WAY slow and it's a really sexy animation according to me. Also, it seems to have really low recoil and sway compared to what we've seen in other guns. - spazzykay

Please stop saying it looks like an M16[]

Really, these comparisons are not nessary. Even if it did look like an M16 that info is not relevant. MofoMax 02:28, September 18, 2011 (UTC)

Unlock[]

What lvl in MP do you unlock it at? do we know? HighbornBEN10, too lazy to sign in:( 99.135.107.70 05:27, September 24, 2011 (UTC)

I think it is unlocked at level 18, but I'm not completely sure. I have checked a lot of websites and most of them say level 18. Sundaydrinker 00:47, November 8, 2011 (UTC)

Article very slanted/Edit War[]

In response to an edit war I've been having with an unregistered user "One of the deadliest assault rifles"? How so? Statistically[1] it kills in 3 shots close, 4 shots long, which is shared by the ACR, G36C and AK47, all three of which have faster RoFs and much less recoil, see this[2] to see the CM901's recoil is about twice as bad as the next worst AR. The next section "This allows it to excel in all engagements, be it far, medium, and even short ranges, where it actually performs with lethal force due to its high damage." is just completely laughable given the above. I'm done edit warring with this guy to moderate his ridiculous views on this garbage AR.Kaelzu 00:12, November 17, 2011 (UTC)

OK, bro. Cool down for a minute or two. Some anons are unpredictable and some are not but if you ignore them then the less times you'll get pissed like it seems you are now.+Have you ever used the CM901 with silencer and kick in multiplayer? It kicks ass, bro. L96 FTW!!!CoDE-2KGo to my talk page!23:25, January 19, 2012 (UTC)

Singleplayer?[]

Is this assault rifle ever seen in the campaign? If so, then add something in about it on the page.

US Army OR-1 Trueblood talk 19:06, December 4, 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, no CM901 in campaign, although if it was, I would go out of my way to find it. FunnyRabbit 23:16, January 19, 2012 (UTC)

The sights[]

  • "relatively clear iron sights"
  • "Because of its bulky iron sights"

There is a contradiction here. --Zaqq 12:55, February 27, 2012 (UTC)

There's nothing wrong with the sights, they're perhaps one of the best sights in terms of both peripherals and precision, compared to the other assault rifles.They aren't bulky when compared to other weapons of its type (which is how we would correctly compare it, not to a machine pistol or shotgun) and thus, shouldn't we only say clear iron sights?86.163.176.127 13:56, February 27, 2012 (UTC)

Advertisement