FANDOM


When a new game releases, I often look at the reviews before I buy the game to decide wether it is worth $100 dollars. Usually there aren't many user reviews, so I rely on critic reviews. Once bought, I take a look at the reviews again. I first check if more critic reviews have been created, then I take a look at user reviews.

Here are some of the negative reviews from users on Metacritic.

PC Negative Reviews:

"Not supporting dedicated servers is an insult to the superiority that is the PC master race. Maybe console gamers can handle the variable latency issues, but I won't."
— Atticas14
Metacritic Score: 0
"First of all, I want to remind everyone that this game still runs on that 10 year old engine, seriously. OK and now onto the game itself, while I haven't ecountered any lag issues for now I'll like to remind everyone that this game DOESN'T HAVE DEDICATED SERVERS OR MOD TOOLS. With the new jumping mechanics, there will be potential for great mods but yep, they're not here. Also, all of this new Exo-suit and whatever **** really is just a rip-off of Crysis and Titanfall."
— ASanePerson
Metacritic Score: 0
"The same boring game 7th time in a row now. Almost 0 changes (they added double jump and exoskeleton like in Titanfall or Crysis- how original), the same bad (made over 10 years ago) fugly engine. The same corridor gameplay, the same retarded enemy ai, the same rehashed "sniper" missions. Single player campaign is 5h short and as bad as always, multi is full of raging kids and cheaters. No thanks. Oh and Activision- where are dedicated servers on pc? You liars."
— YourMumWashes
Metacritic Score: 0

PS3 Negative Reviews:

"The multiplayer is horrible. All guns are reskins from ghosts. Maps are generic looking. The boost jumping ruins the flow of play. Terrible spawns, lag and time to kill. Just bad bad bad."
— Bosefus123
Metacritic Score: 0
"This is a joke, its like farries with guns jumping around. online play is also slow to choppy and i played on zero day, imagine what it will be like when everyone is online playing.limited gun selection crappy graphics,poor spawning already spawn killers. the only things new i see are vertical maps and the ability to jump. oh and you can change how your online character looks big frigging deal. nothing new here but some new paint on a old tired car. thought ghosts was bad this might even be worse. pointless to play in surround sound,sounded better from my tv speakers. Black Ops II was by far the best in the series for online play. Maybe the campaign is good,haven't tried that yet."
— DisapointedFan
Metacritic Score: 1
"I love the Call of Duty franchise, even despite the poor showing of Ghosts, which I'd likely rank a 7. Advanced Warefare, however, is a really poor game. The maps are uninteresting and flawed. The new guns and killstreaks are bizarre, and just not enjoyable to use. The jetpack is the worst addition of all. Matches consist of users flying over one another and shooting enemies in the back, or on the top of the head. This is the first time that I've ever sold a Call of Duty game back. I really didn't find anything redeeming about it."
— zckaln
Metacritic Score: 2

Xbox 360 Negative Reviews:

"The campaign is short and uninspired despite the outstanding voice work by Kevin Spacey. Multiplayer team deathmatch is broken by EXO suits and over powered weaponry. The majority of your deaths will come from behind and above because of the chaotic map design and exo suits."
— SaintofSinners
Metacritic Score: 3
"The next game of the COD series( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)"
— snow_
Metacritic Score: 0

Xbox 1 Negative Reviews:

"Once again the same game, people, please stop buying the same game every year!!! what do you think this will have? This is a Crysis copy!!!!! DON'T BUY IT!"
— joshan2
Metcritic Score: 0
"Another copy of a copy , Call of duty franchise is dead from now on .. The first 4 game were awsome , but for now its a pale copy of an old game , dont buy this .. Stupid activision"
— Massakers
Metacritic Score: 3
"same old sh#t, different cover. COD is nothing but a mediocre shooter that IGN gives it more than it deserves, hence they gave Ghosts 8.8/10.. this is a mere joke it's not even funny, the game still as crappy as the previous COD (Ghosts), nothing has changed except the unrealistic "exoskeleton" suit AKA titanfall copy and paste. Save your money, don't buy this unholy piece of garbage, it's not worth it at all."
— talal1007
Metacritic Score: 0

PS4 Negative Reviews:

(I've used part of this review because it basically sums up the whole thing)

"COD was designed to be a drug (just like Destiny). Get to the next fix. Doesn't matter that it's the same thing every time. It's only about the high. There is always a new unlock, a new killstreak, yada yada to try and fuel this mundane affair. Meanwhile, beaming jingoism into your eye sockets and filling your ears with explosions and the cussing of prepubescent children (even though they are sadly mostly adults), the game is yet again, another rehash, reskin, re-re-er, etc. Reminder: this analysis is coming from someone who hasn't played COD since 2010."
— jstanothergamr

Metacritic Score: 4

"If i had a choice to play this game again or eat some dog poop, i would choose the latter. I have made many mistakes in my life - getting a hooker pregnant being one - but buying this game is the by far the worst one i've ever made. I would rather use a block of sandpaper as a french tickler than play online with the braindead community that exists in this futuristic abortion. 0/10 implies that how i feel about this game can be represented on a scale - it really can't. Activision need a good hard look in the mirror to see what they have created: a modern day Hotel Mario (if that is even possible). regards

Javier Cifuentes"

— HiegSeil

Metacritic Score: 0

"All the guns the same and the game modes the same as previous. Lots of grasshoppers everywhere. Total regurgitated from previous COD's. Totally boring but then I may be suffering from COD burnout. My advice save your money."
— ssweeting

Metacritic Score: 0

Summary

Some of the names of these people are just, ironic. All these reviews are biased, untrue and overall just old complaints. I find some of them kind of funny, but mostly just plain ignorant. Hopefully, you can see the humour of these reviews, as I mostly do.

Finally, the award for worst goes to…

Drumroll please…

HiegSeil!

Your review is the most offensive, and in my opinion, worst review!

Congratulations! I didn't know Advanced Warfare was the worst mistake you have ever made in your life. Even though it didn't kill you, ruin your reputation, make you lose friends or ruin your life in general, it is still worse than all of these.

Thanks for reading this.

Also on a side note, I'm going to be completely active again starting tomorrow!

See you all then,

- Capt. Miller

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.