Wikia

Call of Duty Wiki

Magma-Man

aka Douglas

2,759 Edits since joining this wiki
January 30, 2010
  • I live in Wisconsin
  • I was born on April 24
  • My occupation is High School Student
  • I am Male
  • Archive 1 - January 30th, 2010 - October 24th, 2012

♪ ♫ ♪ Believe it or not, MM isn't here now, please leave a messaaaaaaage, at the beep. ♪ ♫ ♪
♪ ♫ ♪ I must be out, or I'd see you in chat, wheeere could I be? Believe or not, I'm not here!
♪ ♫ ♪


Bad Image Edit

An image you recently uploaded was considered a poor image because it was either:
Call of Duty Wiki logo warning template

  • Low quality
  • Contained a banned image effect
  • Concerned real life info, which is not generally allowed
  • Poorly sized
  • Poorly named
  • Duplicate file
  • Tampered with a photo-editing program

Please read the image policy in order to brush up on the style and professionalism that is expected on this wiki.
You are still free to upload images; however, please make sure they are up to standards!
Thanks!

Bad image names. 12:39, October 25, 2012 (UTC)

ImagesEdit

Don't worry, all we need to do is add "personal Magma-Man" to the front. Just keep the naming convention in mind in the future. 13:06, October 25, 2012 (UTC)

MagsEdit

'sup Mags, if you hate the name, it might be better to not mention it :) --Ebon Shadowshot (Talk) (Contributions) 13:22, October 25, 2012 (UTC)

"or the name chosen for me by DeadRaiser, Mags (screw dat)"
— user page

Just what I was thinking when I read that sentence. --Ebon Shadowshot (Talk) (Contributions) 13:24, October 25, 2012 (UTC)

ReEdit

If new light comes ahead and proves that the newer system shown is fake, the blog would be changed. Although we can't say its not true, but we can't say its true. I do hope that the newer system is not true though, given that the older own seems to have more promise. But in due time, it might or might-not be true. 132527029757.gifArgorrath おしゃべり%E7%95%B0%E8%AD%B0%E3%81%82%E3%82%8A.jpg01:07, November 11, 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I just have a few comments on your blog: Black Ops II: Undeserved Hatred.

You seemingly neglect the realise that you are evidently more interested in the story then Yahtzee. It wasn't his fault that he made errors in understanding the story, it was Treyarch's writers for not making it engaging enough for him. I'm sure the explantions are there, but you can't pretend that it was completely the Yahtzee's fault. Also, it might be easy for you to think Call of Duty: Black Ops II was a major leap forward because you ultimately think you have the ability to gather a small list of improvements, but please tell me, is it his fault the game is simply another in the long line of constant military shooters published by Activision or otherwise? What is wrong with wanting something new? Although some of his arguments may be crude or poorly constructed, he does actually have valid points about the overall trends of the industry and the series as a whole.  And by the way, I know plenty of people who buy Call of Duty but often don't enjoy a particular installment and I feel it is just wrong for you to insult them if they expected more innovation.

Oh, and before you say I'm hiding behind a undisguisable IP address my name is Mark Foster (I owe you my real name, please don't change this edit) and I live in the Southern Australian state of Victoria. 

Have a wonderful 2013 and a happy new year.

49.183.11.76 10:38, November 8, 2013 (UTC)


Reply to Above ArgumentEdit

First thing's first, yes the want for attention was there, I like attention and won't be ashamed to admit it, a lack of attention is the most common reason for me to leave Wikis, especially fanon ones. However the article was written in the middle of the night after viewing Yahtzee's review. I was really angry and didn't have anyone to talk to about it, so I ranted on a blog instead.

The blog was mainly me being pissed at the haters of the series saying that anyone who plays these games is a horrible person. If you are bored with the series by now, stop playing it and leave those who are not bored alone. Yes I was being a bit of a hypocrite by attacking those who say that but I feel it was provoked. Yahtzee was a specific example because he loved Call of Duty 4, yet hated Black Ops II in every way, which calls into question what would his opinion had been if the hundreds of modern war shooters that have been coming out lately hadn't come out? It's not Black Ops II's fault that you people have been over-playing the genre and are bored, which is the reason haters of the game pretty much always give for hating it. There is no reason for those of us who still enjoy the series to be constantly attacked like we are. Magma-Man 18:34, December 28, 2012 (UTC)

I don't want to keep being critical, so I will just end the conversation with the fact that I don't actually have that much of an issue with the Call of Duty series. I'll play it if it's at a friend's house, but I don't have any real realtionship with the game. I was coming from a neutral position. I can assure you not all Australians are so critical, and I actually think your blog was quite well writen - I just disagreed with some of the content. If we don't encounter eachother again, best of luck in all your future goals and aspirations, and I hope you and your loved ones live happy and long lives.

Sorry, I worded the above comment wrong. I stated: "I'm coming in from a neutral position." but that was just a comment on how I feel about the actual Black Ops II Game (Which I have played, not extensively.) but not my overall feelings towards the fact that much of the industry spends far to much time and money on producing generic games to make an extra buck. I think it isn't wrong to say: "You know what, major publishers and developers should focus more on producing new IPs." Cheers. 

Re: CONTAINS MINOR BIOSHOCK INFINITE SPOILERS, PEOPLE VIEWING IN RC. CLICK AT OWN RISK Edit

Too bad Songbird isn't Water Proof, dat cracked porthole. Also, sorry for the weird section title :3 KUDLq.png 02:49, March 31, 2013 (UTC)

Call of Wikia Edit

Good news Magma-Man, I've moved your Call of Wiki Forum to voting! I believe you are allowed to vote, so go ahead. Capt. Miller 02:15, August 6, 2014 (UTC)

The votes are now in your favour, I think your Call of Wikia blog will be allowed! Capt. Miller 02:57, August 10, 2014 (UTC)
I've closed the forum, your blog is now allowed on the wiki, congrats. Capt. Miller 10:12, August 11, 2014 (UTC)
I saw your comment about splitting the blog. You may want to respond to that before you proceed. The forum will remain closed, but I may ahve to reopen it about this new development. 11:29, August 11, 2014 (UTC)
Well, you'll need to understand that posting just one blog as part of a one-off compromise will seem fair to everyone. But if you start posting lots over weekly periods, without another forum to give this the overall OK, then other users may begin copying you unaware of the compromise. Now, once the next forum is up, I have no issues about your blogs, and won't mind lifting the ban on RP blogs and how we handle them, but until then it's best you just post one of the blogs, then assuming the next forum passes, continue from there. And if not you can leave a link on said first blog to where the other sections can be found. 19:24, August 11, 2014 (UTC)

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki