I was looking for this template, but I couldn't find it, so I added this instead. Thanks for telling me.20:24, November 6, 2014 (UTC)
- By the way, Vandal on the F-15 page. 20:44, November 10, 2014 (UTC)
- Another vandal. 09:41, November 11, 2014 (UTC)
Can you block Robotjosh12? He is continuing to remove content from pages. 08:47, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Never mind, Azuris just took care of it. 08:47, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
Re:Re:Rainbow Dash always dresses in styleEditThat's more or less the reaction I'm expecting. 11:53, November 18, 2014 (UTC)
Special:Contributions/184.108.40.206. To be blocked. 17:19, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
User:AnonOpsWIKIA spammer + insults. 17:33, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
Script for voice over sample Edit
Taken from Ahoy's 'MP7- Black Ops 2 Weapon Guide'
"In-game, the MP7 is a low damage weapon: it requires 3 to 4 shots at close range to kill, and up to 6 outside the weapon's relatively short range. This means the MP7 very much specialized for close quarters combat: keeping the enemy within your 4-hit kill zone should be your priority. In addition, like the rest of the SMGs, the MP7's abillity to penetrate cover is poor: for the most part, you will want to land shots directly upon your oppenent."
I'll be using the same script, so it's better for comparison of how each of us do our voice overs.
23:23, November 25, 2014 (UTC)
- You sounded pretty good man. 10/10. 15:14, November 26, 2014 (UTC)
Exo Zombies Trailer/Transcript:Edit
On what grounds does it make a cinematic trailer unnecessary to have a transcript? I mean, it's still a part of the game as a cinematic, right? Any cinematic moment in a game deserves a transcript, don't they? EvErLoyaLEagLE (talk) 22:43, December 2, 2014 (UTC)
I know it's a bit IRLy, I put that in my edit summary. But could you at least reword what I put instead of insisting that the name is just a reference to BOII. 220.127.116.11 17:28, December 7, 2014 (UTC)
after what the anon said in their edit summary it made me think that it was moreover opinionated than vandalism. still, it could be considered vandalism. i will still give the user one last chance though because i already said i would (though sadly i gotta get off in a few minutes so may not get to see if hes done it again). RisingSun2013 22:52, December 10, 2014 (UTC)
i know, but as i said it got me thinking that it wasnt specifically vandalism, but now that youve pointed it out it is still vandalism as well as being opinionated. nevertheless, again, i told the user they had one more chance and so i think i should stick to that unless told otherwise (so if you think the anon should still be banned then i will ban them). RisingSun2013 22:56, December 10, 2014 (UTC)
Hey raven when you banned me it said I could be unmanned on August 14 but where I live it is December 12 do you know why it still has me banned
20:47, December 24, 2014 (UTC)
just read the edit history. Sorry yeah, if they state that in the game than I understand why you keep it. Yet again devs totaly confused basic stuff as allways.Not your fault of course, but it's still stupid.
RE: Dinosaurs Edit
Banned from chat Edit
I was wondering if you could reinstate my chat privileges. The 'reason' for ban is provided below for reference, and I feel as if it was abusive in power. Exacri 01:16, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
hey what i inseted is true Primary and Secondary Gunfighter is in Advanced Warfare check it out.
I don't understand latest change- What's wrong with British Special Forces soldier. I think nationality was important in the page on the right. He comes from Scotland okay and is Scottish, but there is no such thing like Scottish soldiers- there are British soldiers. He is Scottish okay, but about the military it should be British special forces soldier, or British Special Forces soldier (= soldier of UK Special forces).Makarov365 (talk) 10:44, February 12, 2015 (UTC)
I do not force- the nationality page and main info with who the character is are 2 different matters. I've said- I accept the vote about the Nationality info and so I will no chage that. But info about ,,British soldier" is something else Makarov365 (talk) 13:08, February 12, 2015 (UTC)
Happy BirthdayEditcongratulations, you're 23 and Applejack. 09:37, March 2, 2015 (UTC)
- Happy Birthday Raven! 03:27, March 3, 2015 (UTC)
- happy birthday mate. RisingSun2015 (RisingSun's Talk Page · Blog Posts · Contributions) 03:40, March 3, 2015 (UTC)
I'm sorry this took so long, but I just realised I was blocked about a week ago. I must apologize, my brother decided it would be a good prank to go and change some pages or whatever he did. Not asking for an acception here, but do you think you could wipe the block from my talk page? It makes my account look bad and I'm not my brother. Again, sorry. Da Panda Talk 07:51, March 31, 2015 (UTC)
- Fine. I'm not trying to make an excuse, nor was I asking to definately get rid of it. I was merely apoligizing for my "BROTHER'S" behaviour. Sorry for making a commotion.
- Also, you don't live here. I had my laptop open in the loungeroom. My fault I guess.
- Da Panda Talk 08:45, March 31, 2015 (UTC)
- I guess this is one of those "My dog at my homework" situations, where my dog actually ate my homework. Again, sorry for the commotion. I didn't realize my first post sounded so sketchy. I'll just deal with the things on my page until I get it archived (if that happens sometime).
- Da Panda Talk 09:17, March 31, 2015 (UTC)
Well done, you've had that avatar so long your mind is now Appuls.
17:55, April 10, 2015 (UTC)
In regards to your opinion on the British CommandosEdit
You caught my attention when you said the intentions of the British Commandos in Black Ops was vague, saying there was lack of evidence they wanted Nova 6 as Reznov said. However (I know this is old but for some reason I like to debate with people, please forgive me), there are some key points that I believe implies that the British did indeed want Nova 6. To begin with, Steiner explains that the British bombers crippled the ship. If the British wanted to destroy Nova 6, why not outright destroy the ship rather than cripple it? You could argue that perhaps the British didn't know of Nova 6 in the first place. This begs another question then, why didn't the British simply send in more bombers to finish the job, if they didn't want Nova 6 and intended to destroy it? Since they were the ones to cripple it, they would already know where the ship was. I suspect that the British knew from the start that Nova 6 was on the ship, which is why they crippled the ship rather than outright destroy it with bombers. Therefore, the British Commandos sent in (as were seen in the mission in Black Ops), were most likely a clean up crew, killing any German survivors so a pick up crew could be sent in to pick up Nova 6 (although clearly they weren't expecting the Russians to be collaborating with Steiner). Wow, who knew it was possible to be so analytical about Call of Duty.
18.104.22.168 08:54, April 13, 2015 (UTC)